Moving monthly to quarterly will be healthy for overall ecosystem and tokenomics health. Some users may think that unlock will cause price extreme volatility while what I can see $Supra unlock will bring in more liquidity on ecosystem when there’s even more dApps coming in every quarter.
At Solido, we support governance proposals that foster long-term alignment and strengthen the economic resilience of the Supra ecosystem.
On SUP #1, we believe transitioning from monthly to quarterly vesting is a constructive step. It can help reduce short-term market pressure and enhance protocol stability — especially as major launches like SupraNova, PoEL, and SupraEVM approach.
We’re actively listening to our community, and we’d love to hear Solido community’s thoughts on the direction Solido should take. Your feedback plays a direct role in shaping how we vote on proposals that impact the broader ecosystem.
As it stands, we are inclined to vote YES — but we invite the Solido community to share their views over the next 48 hours so we can take action accordingly before voting closes on July 17 at 11:59 PM EST.
Great Idea of a quarterly vesting after the 10min vesting was disastrous. 3m would perfectly fit into the upcoming roadmap and also on citadely unlock.
Quarterly vesting is the right call. Even though I will be affected by this directly, I think long term it’s the right call for the ecosystem. So many good things rolling out! Happy to be part of this community and see it’s growth!
Coinage x DAIC supports this proposal. Thanks Josh!
Well pre-seed round is 12 months lock post TGE and then 24 months quarterly vest.
Seed is 6 months lock, quarterly vest over 24 months.
So it’s going to be max 2.5 years for all to be done.
Most have terms such as 20% at TGE, 5% over 16 months, so they are about 50% done.
As a reminder, founders are locked till 2026 Nov 21st, and max ever they can sell is 5% of vested tokens per month (so that’ll be 20 months after lock period). We are very long term focused. We’re all aligned.
No, it doesn’t. We are working on a program that may still incentivize folks to continue to provide economic security to the network. Likely to share more about that in about 3 weeks.
It should be open to vote in 1-2 days and then likely run for about a week or until a threshold of participants have engaged.
quarterly Is the best ![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I’ll go with YES in this proposal, quarterly vesting is the best for the future of supra.
I go with Yes. This is very good for the tokenomics. Good tokenomics=more investors,traders,Devs and less selling pressure.
That will be great if is quarterly
Just a normal holder so I can’t vote but my vote would be YES as I believe it is all for the growth of the project and would urge the team to come up with a way of including many participants in the next vote
Quarterly sounds better. It will reduce token dumping, stabilizing price swings.
However, the best thing that will keep $SUPRA’s large supply in check is massive token burns. Transaction fees should be increased and 70-80% of fee from every transaction should be burned.
TX fees are likely to be increased 100X and still be very inexpensive. ETA approximately 2 weeks.
Quarterly Vesting Promotes Long-Term Commitment: Crypto projects thrive on sustained development and community building.
Quarterly vesting incentivizes team members, advisors, and early investors to remain committed for longer periods, as larger tranches of tokens are released less frequently. This discourages “get rich quick” behavior and encourages stakeholders to work towards the project’s long-term success rather than seeking quick profits.
Quarterly vesting creates fewer, larger unlock events, which can be easier for the market to absorb and allows for more stable price discovery. This helps maintain a healthier token economy.
First SUP Voting is Live!
Awesome. I really do appreciate to see the live-results as the voting goes on. Max transparency. ![]()

